JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 12, 2013

A- de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alberto Rojas Ríos

✓Claimant Manuel Ramon Araujo Arnedo Vs Consejo Superior De La Judicatura

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela De Magistrado De Tribunal Superior Contra Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Negar solicitud de medida provisional de suspender trámite de segunda instancia sobre recurso de reposición contra sentencia de destitución del cargo
Decreto De Medidas Provisionales
  • Hipótesis para que proceda
Medidas Provisionales
  • Procedencia según Decreto 2591/91 artículo 7
4 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se NIEGA la solicitud de medida provisional invocada por el accionante, relacionada con la suspensión del trámite de otra acción de tutela impetrada por él, en contra de la Sala Disciplinaria del Consejo Superior de la Judicatura.

Lo anterior, en virtud de que la Sala no encontró razones urgentes y necesarias para ordenar la precitada suspensión

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE:
  2. Primero. NEGAR la solicitud de medida provisional invocada por el señor Manuel Ramón Araújo Arnedo de suspender "el trámite de la segunda instancia de la acción de tutela T-00151 de 2013 de Manuel Araujo Arnedo Vs la Sala Disciplinaria del CSJ", por las razones expuestas en la presente providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.